{"id":15423,"date":"2026-09-22T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-09-22T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/?p=15423"},"modified":"2026-09-28T05:41:47","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T09:41:47","slug":"cnc-machining-vs-3d-printing-choose-which-should","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/th\/cnc-machining-vs-3d-printing-choose-which-should\/","title":{"rendered":"CNC Machining vs 3D Printing: Which Should You Choose?"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>article img, .entry-content img, .post-content img, .wp-block-image img, figure img, p img {max-width:100% !important; height:auto !important;}figure { max-width:100%; }img.top-image-square {width:280px !important; height:280px !important; object-fit:cover !important;border-radius:12px; box-shadow:0 2px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.10);}@media (max-width:600px) {img.top-image-square { width:100% !important; height:auto !important; max-height:300px; }p:has(> img.top-image-square) { float:none !important; margin:0 auto 15px auto !important; text-align:center; }}.claim { background-color:#fff4f4; border-left:4px solid #e63946; border-radius:10px; padding:20px 24px; margin:24px 0; font-family:system-ui,sans-serif; line-height:1.6; position:relative; box-shadow:0 2px 6px rgba(0,0,0,0.03); }.claim-true { background-color:#eafaf0; border-left-color:#2ecc71; }.claim-icon { display:inline-block; font-size:18px; color:#e63946; margin-right:10px; vertical-align:middle; }.claim-true .claim-icon { color:#2ecc71; }.claim-title { display:flex; align-items:center; font-weight:600; font-size:16px; color:#222; }.claim-label { margin-left:auto; font-size:12px; background-color:#e63946; color:#fff; padding:3px 10px; border-radius:12px; font-weight:bold; }.claim-true .claim-label { background-color:#2ecc71; }.claim-explanation { margin-top:8px; color:#555; font-size:15px; }.claim-pair { margin:32px 0; }<\/style>\n<p style=\"float: right; margin-left: 15px; margin-bottom: 15px;\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:100%;\" src=\"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/v2-article-1789984922945-1.jpg\" alt=\"Comparison guide showing CNC machining versus 3D printing selection process (ID#1)\" class=\"top-image-square\">\n<\/p>\n<p>Every week, engineers send our Dongguan workshop the same question: CNC machining vs 3D printing \u2014 which one should they trust? Picking wrong wastes budget, delays launches, and kills projects.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Choose CNC machining when you need tight tolerances, strong isotropic material properties, smooth surface finish, and repeatable medium-to-high production volume. Choose 3D printing for rapid prototyping, complex internal geometry, and low-volume customization. Many teams print early prototypes, then switch to CNC for functional and end-use parts.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Neither process is a universal winner. Each one answers a different manufacturing problem. In this guide, I will break down cost, precision, strength, and volume so you can match the right process to your part.<\/p>\n<h2>How do I decide between CNC machining and 3D printing for my project?<\/h2>\n<p>A German buyer once emailed us two files: a printed bracket and a machined housing. His question was simple \u2014 how do we actually decide which process fits which part?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Decide using four variables: part geometry, production volume, mechanical requirements, and lead time. Pick 3D printing for complex shapes, fast iteration, and one-off models. Pick CNC machining for load-bearing parts, tight tolerances, production-grade metals, and repeat batches. Match the process to the part, not the trend.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto;\" src=\"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/v2-article-1789984929070-2.jpg\" alt=\"Decision factors for choosing CNC machining or 3D printing by part geometry and volume (ID#2)\" title=\"CNC vs 3D Printing Decision\"><\/p>\n<p>The core difference is direction. CNC machining is subtractive manufacturing. It starts with a solid block and cuts material away with computer-controlled tools. 3D printing is additive manufacturing. It builds the part layer by layer from a digital file. That single difference drives almost every trade-off between them.<\/p>\n<h3>The side-by-side comparison<\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Criteria<\/th>\n<th>CNC Machining<\/th>\n<th>3D Printing<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Process type<\/td>\n<td>Subtractive (cuts from stock)<\/td>\n<td>Additive (builds in layers)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tolerance<\/td>\n<td>\u00b10.005 to \u00b10.025 mm<\/td>\n<td>\u00b10.1 to \u00b10.5 mm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Surface finish<\/td>\n<td>Ra 0.8\u20133.2 \u00b5m as-machined<\/td>\n<td>Ra 6\u201325 \u00b5m, needs post-processing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Strength<\/td>\n<td>Bulk, isotropic properties<\/td>\n<td>Layer lines can create weak points<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Materials<\/td>\n<td>Metals, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/topics\/engineering\/engineering-plastic\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">engineering plastics<\/a> <sup id=\"ref-1\"><a href=\"#footnote-1\" class=\"footnote-ref\">1<\/a><\/sup>, composites<\/td>\n<td>Mostly polymers, growing metal options<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Complexity<\/td>\n<td>Limited by tool access<\/td>\n<td>Internal channels and lattices possible<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Best volume<\/td>\n<td>Medium to high batches<\/td>\n<td>One-offs and small runs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Material waste<\/td>\n<td>Higher (chips and scrap)<\/td>\n<td>Lower (uses only what the part needs)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>The limitation lens<\/h3>\n<p>I always tell buyers to compare limitations first, then advantages. CNC struggles with internal lattices and deep undercuts because the cutter must physically reach every surface. Printing struggles with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/topics\/metrology\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">dimensional accuracy<\/a> <sup id=\"ref-2\"><a href=\"#footnote-2\" class=\"footnote-ref\">2<\/a><\/sup>, finish, and layer strength. Here is a nuance many people miss: a part that looks complex is often still cheaper to machine. Our <a href=\"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/?p=15309\">5-axis mills<\/a> reach compound angles and curved surfaces that seem &quot;unmachinable&quot; at first glance. Geometric complexity only favors printing when tool access is truly impossible. So define your target use case first \u2014 concept model, functional test, or end-use part \u2014 and the answer usually becomes obvious.<\/p>\n<div class=\"claim-pair\">\n<div class=\"claim claim-true\">\n<div class=\"claim-title\"><span class=\"claim-icon\">\u2714<\/span> CNC machining and 3D printing solve different manufacturing problems rather than competing directly <span class=\"claim-label\">True<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"claim-explanation\">CNC excels at precision, strength, and repeatability, while 3D printing excels at design freedom and fast iteration. Most real projects use each process where it fits best.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"claim claim-false\">\n<div class=\"claim-title\"><span class=\"claim-icon\">\u2718<\/span> 3D printing is replacing CNC machining and will make it obsolete <span class=\"claim-label\">False<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"claim-explanation\">CNC still dominates production-grade parts because of tighter tolerances, better finishes, and stronger material properties. The two technologies increasingly work together, not against each other.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>What are the real cost differences between CNC machining and 3D printing?<\/h2>\n<p>Last year, we quoted the same aluminum bracket at three quantities for a Canadian client. The results surprised him, and they explain the whole cost story better than any theory.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3D printing usually costs less for one part or very small batches because setup is minimal. CNC machining carries higher programming and fixturing costs upfront, but cost per part drops sharply as quantity rises. At around 50 to 100 parts, CNC often becomes the cheaper option.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto;\" src=\"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/v2-article-1789984931265-3.jpg\" alt=\"Cost comparison chart showing CNC machining versus 3D printing pricing at different production volumes (ID#3)\" title=\"Cost Differences Compared\"><\/p>\n<p>The honest answer to &quot;which is cheaper&quot; is always another question: how many parts do you need? Quantity changes everything.<\/p>\n<h3>Cost behavior by volume<\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Quantity<\/th>\n<th>3D Printing<\/th>\n<th>CNC Machining<\/th>\n<th>Likely Winner<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>1 piece<\/td>\n<td>Low setup, fast start<\/td>\n<td>Programming and fixturing dominate the price<\/td>\n<td>3D printing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>10 pieces<\/td>\n<td>Still economical<\/td>\n<td>Setup cost spreads out<\/td>\n<td>Depends on geometry<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>100 pieces<\/td>\n<td>Print capacity becomes a bottleneck<\/td>\n<td>Cycle times drop, unit price falls<\/td>\n<td>CNC machining<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>1,000+ pieces<\/td>\n<td>Rarely competitive<\/td>\n<td>Fully amortized setup, stable unit cost<\/td>\n<td>CNC machining<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>You may have read that CNC can cost five to ten times more than printing. That figure is real in some scenarios \u2014 usually a single, complex, one-off part. But it is not a universal rule. Once our machines are programmed and fixtured, the cost per part collapses. At 100 pieces, machining frequently beats printing on both price and speed.<\/p>\n<h3>The hidden costs both sides carry<\/h3>\n<p>Watch out for costs that never appear in the first quote. Printed parts often need support removal, sanding, and dimensional refinement before they are usable. Machined parts may need custom fixturing for odd shapes. Lead times follow a similar curve: a printed prototype might arrive in 1\u20133 days versus 3\u20137 days for a first machined part. But for 100 parts, CNC is often faster overall because printers hit capacity limits. In our experience quoting for European and North American buyers, clear DFM feedback upfront prevents most of these surprises. We flag cost drivers on the drawing before production starts, because an unexpected invoice damages trust more than any delay.<\/p>\n<div class=\"claim-pair\">\n<div class=\"claim claim-true\">\n<div class=\"claim-title\"><span class=\"claim-icon\">\u2714<\/span> CNC machining cost per part drops significantly as production quantity increases <span class=\"claim-label\">True<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"claim-explanation\">Setup, programming, and fixturing are one-time costs. Spread across 100 or 1,000 parts, they become negligible, while machining cycle times per part stay fast and consistent.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"claim claim-false\">\n<div class=\"claim-title\"><span class=\"claim-icon\">\u2718<\/span> 3D printing is always the cheaper manufacturing option <span class=\"claim-label\">False<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"claim-explanation\">Printing wins mainly at very low quantities. For batches of roughly 50\u2013100 parts and beyond, CNC machining usually delivers a lower unit price and shorter total lead time.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Which process gives me better precision and material strength for my parts?<\/h2>\n<p>During a recent CMM inspection at our metrology station, we verified a batch of optical housings to \u00b10.005 mm. That check is where the precision gap becomes visible, not theoretical.<\/p>\n<p><strong>CNC machining delivers better precision and strength. Machined parts hold tolerances of \u00b10.005 to \u00b10.025 mm with Ra 0.8\u20133.2 \u00b5m finishes, and keep the bulk, isotropic properties of solid stock. 3D-printed parts typically hold \u00b10.1 to \u00b10.5 mm and can be weaker between layers.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto;\" src=\"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/v2-article-1789984933052-4.jpg\" alt=\"Precision and strength comparison between CNC machined parts and 3D printed components (ID#4)\" title=\"Precision and Strength Comparison\"><\/p>\n<p>Precision is not one number. It covers dimensional accuracy, surface finish, and consistency across a batch. CNC leads on all three, and the reason goes back to physics.<\/p>\n<h3>Why machined parts are stronger<\/h3>\n<p>A machined part starts as forged or extruded stock. Its material properties are uniform in every direction \u2014 engineers call this isotropic. A printed part is built from fused layers. The bond between layers is usually weaker than the material within a layer. This creates directional weakness, often called Z-axis weakness or anisotropy. For a decorative model, that does not matter. For a load-bearing bracket in an automation machine, it can mean failure. That is why aerospace and medical components still default to machining, where \u00b10.025 mm tolerances are the working standard.<\/p>\n<h3>Precision and materials at a glance<\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Factor<\/th>\n<th>CNC Machining<\/th>\n<th>3D Printing<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Typical tolerance<\/td>\n<td>\u00b10.005 to \u00b10.025 mm<\/td>\n<td>\u00b10.1 to \u00b10.5 mm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Surface finish<\/td>\n<td>Ra 0.8\u20133.2 \u00b5m<\/td>\n<td>Ra 6\u201325 \u00b5m<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Strength behavior<\/td>\n<td>Isotropic, predictable<\/td>\n<td>Anisotropic, orientation-dependent<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Material range<\/td>\n<td>Aluminum, stainless steel, titanium, brass, PEEK, POM, nylon<\/td>\n<td>Polymers, resins, select metal powders<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Material availability matters too. On our production floor, we machine aluminum, stainless steel, copper, brass, titanium, and tool steel, plus engineering plastics like PEEK, POM, and PPSU. Printing supports a narrower, process-dependent range. And remember: &quot;printable&quot; does not always mean economically or reliably printable at your required grade. When the drawing specifies 6061-T6 or 316 stainless with a material certificate, machining from certified stock removes all doubt.<\/p>\n<div class=\"claim-pair\">\n<div class=\"claim claim-true\">\n<div class=\"claim-title\"><span class=\"claim-icon\">\u2714<\/span> CNC machined parts retain the full isotropic strength of the original material stock <span class=\"claim-label\">True<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"claim-explanation\">Because subtractive manufacturing cuts from solid billet, the finished part keeps uniform mechanical properties in every direction, which is critical for load-bearing applications.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"claim claim-false\">\n<div class=\"claim-title\"><span class=\"claim-icon\">\u2718<\/span> A 3D-printed part in the same material is just as strong as a machined one <span class=\"claim-label\">False<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"claim-explanation\">Layer adhesion creates directional weak points, so printed parts often fail under loads that machined parts handle easily, especially along the Z-axis build direction.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Should I choose CNC machining or 3D printing for prototyping versus mass production?<\/h2>\n<p>The trade-off I weigh most often for clients is iteration speed against production readiness. A prototype that cannot represent the final part creates false confidence \u2014 a lesson several customers learned the hard way.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Use 3D printing for early prototypes and concept models, where speed and design freedom matter most. Use CNC machining for functional prototypes, validation builds, and mass production, where accuracy, material properties, and repeatability matter. Many successful projects print first, then machine for final production.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto;\" src=\"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/v2-article-1789984935116-5.jpg\" alt=\"Prototyping versus mass production workflow using 3D printing and CNC machining methods (ID#5)\" title=\"Prototyping vs Mass Production\"><\/p>\n<p>The CNC machining vs 3D printing question changes as your project matures. Early on, you need speed and cheap iteration. Later, you need parts that behave exactly like production parts. Here is the practical sequence I recommend.<\/p>\n<h3>A simple decision checklist<\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Concept model or fit check?<\/strong> Print it. Speed beats precision at this stage.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Functional test under real loads?<\/strong> Machine it. You need production material properties, not a look-alike.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Custom one-off or highly personalized part?<\/strong> Print it, unless it carries load or needs tight fits.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Batch of 50 to 100+?<\/strong> Machine it. Repeatability and unit cost favor CNC.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Certified end-use part?<\/strong> Machine it, with inspection reports and material certificates.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>Where the two processes now work together<\/h3>\n<p>Hybrid manufacturing is the trend worth watching. Some teams print a near-net shape, then finish critical surfaces by CNC to hit final tolerances. Others maintain a digital inventory, printing legacy spare parts on demand instead of warehousing them. AI-driven <a href=\"https:\/\/www.autodesk.com\/solutions\/generative-design\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">generative design<\/a> <sup id=\"ref-3\"><a href=\"#footnote-3\" class=\"footnote-ref\">3<\/a><\/sup> is also pushing organic, optimized shapes toward printing, since traditional toolpaths cannot replicate them affordably. But be careful with sustainability claims. Printing wastes less raw material, yet total energy consumption per part in high-volume CNC production is frequently lower than long print cycles running for days. At our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iso.org\/iso-9001-quality-management.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">ISO 9001:2015<\/a> <sup id=\"ref-4\"><a href=\"#footnote-4\" class=\"footnote-ref\">4<\/a><\/sup> certified factory, we support this full journey \u2014 rapid prototyping in as little as 5 days, then low-volume runs, then <a href=\"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/?p=15331\">mass production<\/a> on the same drawings with first article inspection. Stable batches, not just good samples, are what get products to market.<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>CNC machining wins on precision, strength, and scaled production volume. 3D printing wins on speed, geometric complexity, and one-offs. Match the process to your part \u2014 or combine both wisely.<\/p>\n<h2>Footnotes<\/h2>\n<p><span id=\"footnote-1\"><br \/>\n1. Technical overview of high-performance polymers used in industrial machining for their superior mechanical and thermal properties. <a href=\"#ref-1\" class=\"footnote-backref\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span id=\"footnote-2\"><br \/>\n2. NIST resource on metrology and the standards for measuring precision in manufactured components. <a href=\"#ref-2\" class=\"footnote-backref\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span id=\"footnote-3\"><br \/>\n3. Explains how AI-driven design creates complex geometries often optimized for additive manufacturing processes. <a href=\"#ref-3\" class=\"footnote-backref\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span id=\"footnote-4\"><br \/>\n4. Official standard for quality management systems, ensuring consistent production quality in manufacturing environments. <a href=\"#ref-4\" class=\"footnote-backref\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n  \"mainEntity\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"CNC Machining vs 3D Printing: Which Should You Choose?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Choose CNC machining when you need tight tolerances, strong isotropic material properties, smooth surface finish, and repeatable medium-to-high production volume. Choose 3D printing for rapid prototyping, complex internal geometry, and low-volume customization. Many teams print early prototypes, then switch to CNC for functional and end-use parts.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"How do I decide between CNC machining and 3D printing for my project?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Decide using four variables: part geometry, production volume, mechanical requirements, and lead time. Pick 3D printing for complex shapes, fast iteration, and one-off models. Pick CNC machining for load-bearing parts, tight tolerances, production-grade metals, and repeat batches. Match the process to the part, not the trend.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"What are the real cost differences between CNC machining and 3D printing?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"3D printing usually costs less for one part or very small batches because setup is minimal. CNC machining carries higher programming and fixturing costs upfront, but cost per part drops sharply as quantity rises. At around 50 to 100 parts, CNC often becomes the cheaper option.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Which process gives me better precision and material strength for my parts?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"CNC machining delivers better precision and strength. Machined parts hold tolerances of \u00b10.005 to \u00b10.025 mm with Ra 0.8\u20133.2 \u00b5m finishes, and keep the bulk, isotropic properties of solid stock. 3D-printed parts typically hold \u00b10.1 to \u00b10.5 mm and can be weaker between layers.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Should I choose CNC machining or 3D printing for prototyping versus mass production?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Use 3D printing for early prototypes and concept models, where speed and design freedom matter most. Use CNC machining for functional prototypes, validation builds, and mass production, where accuracy, material properties, and repeatability matter. Many successful projects print first, then machine for final production.\"\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n[\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"ClaimReview\",\n    \"url\": \"\",\n    \"claimReviewed\": \"CNC machining and 3D printing solve different manufacturing problems rather than competing directly\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n      \"name\": \"Article Author\"\n    },\n    \"reviewRating\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n      \"ratingValue\": 5,\n      \"bestRating\": 5,\n      \"worstRating\": 1,\n      \"alternateName\": \"True\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"ClaimReview\",\n    \"url\": \"\",\n    \"claimReviewed\": \"3D printing is replacing CNC machining and will make it obsolete\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n      \"name\": \"Article Author\"\n    },\n    \"reviewRating\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n      \"ratingValue\": 1,\n      \"bestRating\": 5,\n      \"worstRating\": 1,\n      \"alternateName\": \"False\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"ClaimReview\",\n    \"url\": \"\",\n    \"claimReviewed\": \"CNC machining cost per part drops significantly as production quantity increases\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n      \"name\": \"Article Author\"\n    },\n    \"reviewRating\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n      \"ratingValue\": 5,\n      \"bestRating\": 5,\n      \"worstRating\": 1,\n      \"alternateName\": \"True\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"ClaimReview\",\n    \"url\": \"\",\n    \"claimReviewed\": \"3D printing is always the cheaper manufacturing option\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n      \"name\": \"Article Author\"\n    },\n    \"reviewRating\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n      \"ratingValue\": 1,\n      \"bestRating\": 5,\n      \"worstRating\": 1,\n      \"alternateName\": \"False\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"ClaimReview\",\n    \"url\": \"\",\n    \"claimReviewed\": \"CNC machined parts retain the full isotropic strength of the original material stock\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n      \"name\": \"Article Author\"\n    },\n    \"reviewRating\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n      \"ratingValue\": 5,\n      \"bestRating\": 5,\n      \"worstRating\": 1,\n      \"alternateName\": \"True\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"ClaimReview\",\n    \"url\": \"\",\n    \"claimReviewed\": \"A 3D-printed part in the same material is just as strong as a machined one\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n      \"name\": \"Article Author\"\n    },\n    \"reviewRating\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n      \"ratingValue\": 1,\n      \"bestRating\": 5,\n      \"worstRating\": 1,\n      \"alternateName\": \"False\"\n    }\n  }\n]\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Choose between CNC machining vs 3D printing using this guide comparing cost, precision, strength, and volume to match the right process to your part.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":15418,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15423","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cnc-basic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15423","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15423"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15423\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15555,"href":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15423\/revisions\/15555"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15418"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15423"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15423"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stcncmachining.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}